Sunday, December 6, 2009

UPDATE 1-Litigation fund Burford makes first investments


Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:40am EST

Stocks

Burford Capital Limited
BURF.L
105.50p
+0.00+0.00%
12:00am GMT
Juridica Investments Ltd
JIL.L
122.00p
+0.00+0.00%
12:00am GMT

* Burford invests $4.3 mln in two cases

STOCKS | IPOS

* Company is in due dilligence on more potential cases

LONDON, Nov 23 (Reuters) - Burford Capital (BURF.L), the AIM-listed investor in corporate lawsuits -- said on Monday it has made its first two investments since raising 80 million pounds ($132.3 million) in an IPO last month.

Burford has invested $2 million in a trade secret theft and breach of contract case pending in a U.S. federal court and put up $2.3 million for a shareholder dispute over proceeds from the sale of a business.

Commercial dispute funds seek to secure a proportion of the payouts awarded in legal cases by paying a proportion of the costs. Burford is chaired by former Barclays chairman and chief executive officer Peter Middleton and competes with London-listed Juridica Investments (JIL.L).

It also said in a statement that more investments are imminent and it is in due diligence with a number of the 25 potential cases it has reviewed in the last month.

The two cases are for Burford's short duration portfolio of disputes expected to pay a return within 18 months.

The trade secret theft case has a trial date set for May next year. Burford will be entitled to receive 35 percent to 67 percent of settlements depending on the size of payout.

The second investment is structured to pay three times Burford's commitment if the case is settled during arbitration, and four times if settled subsequently. ($1=.6047 Pound) (Reporting by Chris Vellacott) (For the Hedge Hub blog: blogs.reuters.com/hedgehub) (For Global Investing: here) ((chris.vellacott@thomsonreuters.com; +44 (0) 20 7542 3987; Reuters Messaging chris.vellacott.thomsonreuters.com@reuters.net)

In Hot Pursuit of Hidden Loot

FAREWELL TO CONTINGENCY FEES. THIS GOLDEN AGE of financial fraud has opened up a new vein of capital for lawyers. Hedge funds, endowments, and institutional investors are pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into partnerships created by the lawyers in return for a share of any court awards, settlements, and recovered assets.

The lawyers are attracting so much lucre that the practice of law may never again be the same. One big plus for investors in these partnerships is that the major competitors in the field are feckless, under-funded securities regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The latest entrant is Canadian-born lawyer Martin Kenney, an ace at asset recovery. Kenney, who lives in the British Virgin Islands, is especially adept at sniffing out fraudster hidey-holes in far-flung places like Africa, the Caribbean Islands, and Switzerland; he has hunted for assets in more than 50 countries. Kenney currently represents a European bank trying to recover $10 billion from two Madoff feeder funds, and some U.S. investors taken in by a huge currency-trading scam.

So many crooks have salted away so much loot -- an estimated $30 billion worldwide -- that Kenney and some partners have decided to create a private fund, called Echemus, to raise $150 million to bankroll recovery efforts. These will be made on behalf of fraud plaintiffs and claimants of legal awards, who will receive 70% of any disgorgements; the limited partnership divvies up the remaining 30% among itself and the investors.

Echemus hopes to provide investors with pre-tax annual returns of 35%, net of fees, expenses, and carried interest. The investment term is 10 years.

WHY WOULD CLAIMANTS sign on with Kenney? Often because they are left nearly penniless after investing with someone like Madoff and no longer can afford private legal counsel. While they could turn to the SEC, which pursues stolen funds in jurisdictions where it has a legal standing, the agency has a spotty record when it comes to actually recovering the loot.

Between 1995 and 2001, the SEC collected $426 million, or only about 14%, of the $3.1 billion owed to investors in disgorgement cases (cases where a court orders a firm or an individual convicted of fraud to turn over assets).

I tried to obtain a more current number and discovered that the SEC doesn't keep one. What's more disquieting, an audit by the U.S. Government Accountability Office released last month found material weaknesses in the agency's internal controls, which means that mistakes in its financial reports might go undetected. The GAO named "accounts payable data for payments to harmed investors" as one area affected by the weaknesses. So the number I sought may not be a good one.

JAMES LITTLE OF BALTIMORE, one of the founders of Echemus, says that "litigation financing" emerged as an investment opportunity over the past 10 years as courts in Great Britain and other jurisdictions struck down laws prohibiting investments in lawsuits.

The laws vary by state in the U.S. You can't invest in lawsuits in New York State, for instance, says Little. Earlier funds focused on bringing securities-related suits against corporations. Two companies in this field, Juridica Investments (ticker: JIL.UK) and Burford Capital, (BUR.UK)) trade in London. In the U.S., Juris Capital, which is owned by hedge funds, finances litigation.

Richard Scheff, a securities-fraud expert and chairman of the Montgomery, McCracken Walker & Rhoads law firm in Philadelphia, said there's criticism from the defense bar that this sort of investment vehicle promotes law suits.

Asset reclamation is less controversial because lawyers like Kenney generally have a court order. Nevertheless, it is an expensive and time-consuming and financially risky undertaking, often involving investigations and legal actions in multiple jurisdictions.

Firms that take such cases on a contingency basis sometimes skate near the brink of insolvency before a recovery is made, Scheff says. A limited-partnership structure, by contrast, gives lawyers the capital required for multiple cases.

Echemus already is eyeing collections on some 25 commercial-fraud and third-party liability claims with a putative value of $2.6 billion. The partnership estimates that costs will average about $5 million per case.

Finding illicit money has gotten easier over the past 25 years. Little says that during Ronald Reagan's term, money-laundering laws aimed at drug dealers facilitated the tracking and retrieval of all kinds of dirty money.

Crooks have a problem: They must hide their loot in stable jurisdictions or risk having it stolen. This gives asset-hunters a great advantage. The golden age of fraud might not be golden at all.

E-mail: jim.mctague@barrons.com

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Nordic Partnership & Gemini Partners present:-

Echemus online every Wednesday at 2.30 GMT


Presentation dates are November 4th , 11th, 18th,25th 2009

START at 2.30pm GMT END 3.30pm GMT.

Click Here to Enter presentation on Wednesday at 2.30pm GMT.

Dial in conference number on +44(0)207 193 3604 or If you have skype please click here Skype Me™!

Bookmark and Share

Top Global Commercial Fraud Lawyers and Investment Professionals Plan Launch of Asset Recovery Fund

BALTIMORE & BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A team of top global commercial fraud lawyers and investment professionals is launching a $150 million investment fund, named Echemus, to underwrite the investigation, seizure and recovery of world-wide assets for victims of fraud.

The team is led by Martin Kenney, a renowned commercial fraud lawyer and asset recovery specialist currently engaged in unwinding billions of dollars connected to the Bernard Madoff investment scheme.

Called a "top international asset chaser" by The Financial Times, Kenney will serve as managing director of the fund and will oversee all of its investigation, collection and litigation activities.

Kenney has personally underwritten multi-jurisdictional asset recovery claims since 1993, but said the growth and complexity of global fraud has outpaced the means of individual investors. The International Monetary Fund estimates that purportedly fraudulent, “black transactions” account for 5 to 10 percent of the world’s gross domestic product each year, and data from the International Chamber of Commerce shows more than $1 billion in high-value commercial fraud is reported every month worldwide.

“Many victims have nowhere to turn to recover assets, and corporations or governments often lack the incentive or the political will to prosecute perpetrators, who might be former high-ranking officials from their own organizations,” said Kenney.

“To unravel the world’s largest and most complicated frauds, and to recover the assets for victims requires an array of forensic accountants, investigators and specialized law firms,” he said. “Echemus will provide fraud victims the financial and human resources they need to mount such an operation, in exchange for a portion of the assets recovered.”

Echemus aims to finance a portfolio of approximately 25 high-value commercial fraud, asset recovery and third-party liability claims. Echemus will finance and help manage the asset recovery process for claimants in exchange for an average of 30 percent of what they recover.

“As an investment, the market for financing asset-recovery claims is vast and substantially untapped,” said Echemus co-founder and private equity veteran, Jim Little. “We already have over $5 billion in high-value claims on our desks requiring funding. On average, asset recovery claims typically cost $5 million to pursue, so the multiples here are very attractive.”


Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Echemus Asset Recovery Fund

Nordic Partnership & Gemini Partners present:-

Echemus online every Wednesday.

Presentation dates are November 11th, 18th,25th 2009

START at 2.30pm GMT END 3.30pm GMT.

Dial conference number on +44(0)207 193 3604 or If you have skype please click here Skype Me™!

Bookmark and Share

About Asset Recovery

Asset recovery is the single most effective method of taking the profit out of crime and restoring property to its rightful owners

Asset recovery is both a law enforcement tool designed to recover the proceeds of criminal activity and a method of restoring assets to wronged parties through private sector investigation and tracing efforts. By removing the profits and instruments of wrongful activity, asset recovery disrupts fraud, money laundering and other processes of withholding assets from their rightful owners and dismantles criminal organizations. By increasing the risk that criminals will have to give up their ill-gotten assets, it also reduces the incentive to commit crimes.

Monies and other assets recovered and forfeited by governments and private agencies can be used for victim restitution and, in some cases, for law enforcement purposes. Forfeiture funds are often used to finance enhancements in law enforcement training and equipment, or to provide case support that improves the ability of law enforcement to reduce crime, and makes it more difficult for new criminal organizations to establish themselves.

There are three types of forfeiture: civil, criminal and administrative.

In a civil forfeiture proceeding, charges are brought in rem, or against a thing, such as a car used to transport illegal drugs or a building used as a brothel. Civil forfeiture is generally used to remove the instrumentalities or proceeds of crime from the streets.

Criminal forfeiture occurs after a person is convicted of a crime. The forfeiture element of the sentence is meant to strip away the proceeds of illegal activity and, in some cases, to make restitution available to victims.


Administrative forfeiture occurs outside the judicial system, and can only be applied when the assets in question are unclaimed. If a person asserts a claim to assets in an administrative forfeiture proceeding, the government can only move forward with the forfeiture effort by filing a civil or criminal action.
Private sector agencies and investigators in the asset recovery field share a similar mission with their public sector counterparts. "Private sector professionals do battle with overseas bank secrecy, confront the problems of complex cases in multiple jurisdictions and gathering evidence from secretive institutions, just as government agents do. They both need smart, sophisticated, state-of-the art intelligence and training," says Charles Intriago, founder of IAAR. For them, asset recovery allows for restitution to victims and businesses who have been defrauded or otherwise deprived of their assets. Every day, CPAs, forensic accountants, insurance companies, trustees, receivers and banks use this valuable tool to restore assets to their rightful owners.

Bookmark and Share

Blue Print for Asset Recovery







Martin Kenney who sits on the Advisory Board will be a Key speaker at the latest Conference on Asset Recovery

Who should attend?

  1. Bank officers in special assets, asset recovery
  2. Bankruptcy trustees and attorneys
  3. Law enforcement special agents
  4. Prosecutors who work in asset forfeiture
  5. FDIC-appointed and other liquidators
  6. Insurance company Special Investigative Unit investigators, analysts
  7. Attorneys specializing in:
  8. Asset recovery
  9. Financial institutions
  10. Litigation
  11. International law
  12. Intellectual property
  13. Matrimonial
  14. Receivers
  15. Investigators
  16. Forensic accountants
  17. Credit card company fraud and restitution units
  18. Corporate monitors
  19. Private inspectors general
  20. Contract investigators for federal agencies
  21. Trademark counterfeit corporate victims
  22. Auditors

register for the conference here

Bookmark and Share

The International Association for Asset Recovery (IAAR)

About IAAR

The International Association for Asset Recovery (IAAR) is a membership organization for private and public sector professionals who work in the field of asset recovery. Founded in 2008 as the Association of Certified Asset Forfeiture Specialists, its mission is to enhance the capabilities and standards of professionals and agencies worldwide in the battle to win back assets that rightfully belong to governments, organizations or individuals victimized by criminal or wrongful conduct.

Taking away the ill-gotten gains of wrongdoers and using them either to make restitution to victims or to strengthen the arm of law enforcement in the fight against crime is one of the most powerful weapons available for keeping the public safe, eliminating corruption, and crippling cross-border criminal enterprises. Tracing and recovering the assets of individuals whose rightful property is being withheld from them likewise serves the cause of justice. We at IAAR are committed to promoting and advancing the legal, effective and ethical use of asset recovery as a tool by both the public and private sectors. Used properly, asset recovery can have a devastating effect on illicit activity that is driven by financial motives.

The work our members do every day helps keep communities around the world safe and assets in the hands of their rightful owners. That is why the need for qualified asset recovery specialists continues to intensify and the rewards that come from ensuring that they have the necessary legal and investigative skills are growing. IAAR is dedicated to doing everything possible to ensure that members stay on the leading edge of asset recovery strategies and practice.
"Criminals in the United States today put at risk less than 1 percent of the dirty money they make. That's a very attractive risk for them to assume from their life of crime. They earn about $500 billion from crime, while government agencies at all levels-federal, state and local-seize and forfeit only about $4 billion each year."
- Charles Intriago, Founder of AssetRecoveryWatch.com and IAAR

To accomplish that, IAAR is devoting its energies to creating a global community of expertly trained recovery specialists and identifying ways to maximize the use of asset tracing and recovery while safeguarding the public against illegal or overzealous seizure. IAAR helps professionals and law enforcement agencies carry out their vital work by connecting them to a worldwide professional community so that they can share tactics, experiences and tools, and make their efforts even more successful.

Litigation funding employed in £400m divorce

Funding firms steps in to help find alleged missing millions

The very public proceedings in the Young divorce case have made further headlines by highlighting the use of litigation funding to help find the alleged missing millions.

The proceedings in the High Court first hit the news after the husband claimed he was now penniless, though once worth £400m, and a retort from the wife that he had faked a mental breakdown to avoid discovery. The latest twist is the revelation that a commercial litigation funder, Harbour Litigation Funding, has now stepped in to assist the wife trace the allegedly missing money.

More on this story can be found on the FT website here. This development has also inspired Boris Johnson for his weekly Telegraph column, who reflects that such funding can only help London's image as the divorce capital of the world:

"These zillionaires are going to get divorced, whatever we do..... And if they are going to get divorced, isn't there a cynical economic logic in encouraging them to do it in London?

Far from being a sign of moral malaise, I am inclined to see this Divorce Fund initiative as the latest evidence of the resilience of the London economy."

The full article can be found on The Telegraph website here.

Friday, September 11, 2009

Rees Morrison's blog on litigation funding...


An article in Fortune, May 11, 2009 at 20, adds some details to what I wrote about previously on funding of litigation by third parties (See my post of April 11, 2009: litigation financing; Jan. 6, 2009: law suit financing offshore; March 20, 2009: a firm in hedge-fund financed litigation; and March 27, 2009: hedge funds and the secondary market for patents.)Juridica was launched in December 2007 by two lawyers, Richard Fields and Timothy Scramtom. It has raised money by selling shares on the London Stock Exchange’s small-companies market. According to the Fortune article, "insurance companies like Allianz in Germany and several independent investors have launched funds to invest in suits.” Credit Suisse likewise has a litigation finance unit. The business model of these groups doesn’t sound complicated: "Like Juridica, these funds invest amounts typically between $1 million and $5 million in cases where companies sue each other for anticompetitive behavior, contract breaches, and so on."Other people also invest in lawsuits, most notoriously so-called patent trolls (See my post of Jan. 20, 2006: trolls and litigation costs; Oct. 29, 2006: Qualcomm’s business model; May 13, 2007: Microsoft’s litigation against trolls; and June 25, 2008: advice against troll litigation.).
To Learn More Click Here

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Investing in Lawsuits, for a Share of the Awards


Richard W. Fields says he has come up with a win-win financial strategy for the downturn. He is investing in lawsuits. Not in trip-and-fall cases, mind you, but in disputes that are far larger, more costly and potentially more lucrative, often pitting major corporations against each other. Mr. Fields is chief executive of Juridica Capital Management, which runs a fund that invests in one side of a lawsuit in exchange for a share of any winnings. “It’s always a good time to invest in litigation,” Mr. Fields said, though he added that the weak economy helped. “When the recession started to bite, the phones started ringing off the hook. Last year, we looked at 122 cases and we made 17 investments.” A small but growing number of investors are exploring this idea, helping companies avoid some of the risks and costs of litigation in exchange for part of any money paid out when the case is settled or resolved by a court. After all, it can be costly to hire lawyers, who may charge close to $1,000 an hour at the most elite firms.
To Learn More Click Here

Juris Capital provides $500,000 to $3 million per case for litigation funding...


Fellow litigation investor David Desser, the managing director of Chicago-based Juris Capital, said his company typically provides $500,000 to $3 million to fund a case. In return, investors are earning "well in excess" of 20 per cent annually on their overall portfolio. “Given the conditions in the economy, you have a set of circumstances that are pushing both clients and law firms to look for outside investor help,” said Desser. The investing companies say that because they do not take control of the lawsuit from the company and lawyers waging it, their most important task is identifying cases likely to produce a substantial return. That means, for example, rejecting claims that raise novel legal questions or that will probably end up before a jury.
juriscapitalcorp.com

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

From 2007 - Litigation Funding - The New Growth Area

Litigation funding has recently hit the headlines, in particular through news reports that an accountancy firm is facing a £90 million negligence claim brought with the help of outside funders. In addition, the Privy Council has very recently had to consider the extent to which claimants can sell their litigation claims to others, which in theory represents an attractive model for those wishing to invest in litigation. All this reflects the growing trend towards litigation funding which litigators have been seeing for some time.
To Learn More click Here

Litigation funding: an overview of a contentious area of growth

Third-party funding is certainly provoking debate. Tony Guise, of costs specialists Guise, says there has been a lot of ‘hot air’ about third-party funding over the last 18 months. ‘Some funders are drawing in their horns because the recession means recoverability is in doubt, while others are becoming more aggressive. There is no shortage of funding available – people are putting together capital funds of £20m-£30m – but it is not clear how many cases are actually being funded this way.
Everyone is watching the InnovatorOne case, where Addleshaw Goddard is representing several hundred investors backed by third-party funding. Everyone is after the big commercial action but they are inherently risky and they don’t provide a good business model. But the litigation funding market is attracting international interest. John Rossos is principal of Canadian BridgePoint Financial Services, which funds both law firms and individual cases. He has been in the UK researching opportunities and likes what he sees. ‘While the US market is huge, we feel we have a better cultural and legal fit with the UK. I also believe that the Legal Services Act will be the “big bang” for legal services. Sam Eastwood, partner in Norton Rose’s dispute resolution team, has first-hand experience of the market in one of the largest independently funded cases – the Stone & Rolls £69.5m professional negligence claim against accountancy firm Moore Stephens, bankrolled by IM Litigation Funding
To Learn More Click Here

World Bank to help recover $2 billion in stolen money


President Mohamed Nasheed said he would be seeking the help of the World Bank’s Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative (StAR) to retrieve more than US$2 billion in embezzled funds. Speaking to international journalists yesterday, Nasheed said recovering the money was essential to help the government plug its gaping budget deficit, currently 34 per cent of GDP. “Usually countries start worrying when they go over 14 [per cent],” he said. Nasheed established a commission in May to investigate allegations of rampant corruption in more than 30 audit reports of state institutions under the former president, Maumoon Abdul Gayoom. The main opposition Dhivehi Rayyithunge Party (DRP) have denounced the reports as biased and not based on fact. Asset recovery is an essential part of StAR, a joint UN and World Bank project, and obtains help from developed countries to locate the proceeds of corruption, often stashed away in international financial centres. Speaking yesterday, Nasheed said international help was needed due to an absence of forensic investigative and forensic accounting skills in the country.
To Learn More Click Here

Follow the money: the world's sharpest fraudbusters


This article was taken from the October issue of Wired UK magazine. Be the first to read Wired's articles in print before they're posted online, and get your hands on loads of additional content by subscribing online. The first sign of trouble was the 911 call from Susan Lok's Glendora home. It was March 2003, and the currency trader had just taken an overdose. The ambulance crew was greeted by a suburban Los Angeles house where Lok had been living with her Cambodian father - and secretly passing millions of dollars from a sophisticated Ponzi fraud through the family bank account.
To Learn More Click Here

Juridica Investments

Third-party litigation funding has jumped into the mainstream of financial investments with the first admission to AIM of a specialist litigation fund.
Juridica Investments, founded by two US lawyers, will invest in claims of more than $2m (£1.01m), mainly focusing on US-based litigation and international arbitrations.
Norton Rose dispute resolution partner Sam Eastwood said: "The launch serves as further reinforcement that the litigation market's going to be going through quite a change - and not just in the UK." Juridica has an investment management arm that will locate and vet cases that could be funded. It will
also use around half of its £78.4m IPO proceeds to make loans to firms where direct investment is not permitted or wanted by plaintiffs. One such firm is Washington DC-based Fields & Scrantom, owned by Juridica's founders Richard Fields and Timothy Scrantom. The biggest single investment or loan it will make will be $10m (£5.06m), unless its board gives special approval. Although initial cases will be US, the company hopes to invest in cases in other jurisdictions.
To Learn More Click Here

Patent Pirates


Hedge funds and institutional investors are financing the latest wave of IP lawsuits.
This deal was dreamed up by Robert Kramer, who founded Altitude in 2005, raising $250 million from hedge funds and others to invest in intellectual property. So far Kramer has put $100 million to work in nine investments. He's got plenty of company in this new game. Coller Capital, a London private equity firm with a $2.6 billion fund, quietly formed Coller IP Capital with an eye toward investing $200 million a year. Rembrandt IP Management, a Bala Cynwyd, Pa. firm, has raised $150 million, and Northwater Capital, a $9 billion Toronto manager of funds of hedge funds, put together NW Patent Funding last year. Both exist solely to exploit patent lawsuits in the U.S.
Sounds a lot like patent trolling...
To Learn More Click Here